Technology

PTFE Membranes in Bone Grafting and Ridge Preservation

Dense PTFE (d-PTFE) and expanded PTFE membranes are workhorses of guided bone regeneration. Here's how they compare with resorbable collagen membranes and when each is indicated.

Reading time
6–8 min
Medically reviewed
Reviewed by a licensed dentist
Last updated
2026-06-01

Medically reviewed by

Medical Review Board (External Clinical Advisors)

Medical review

Editorial review

Evidence Review Lead

Editorial review

Last reviewed:
2026-06-01
Last updated:
2026-06-01
Reading time:
6–8 min
Version:
1.0

Overview

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) uses a membrane to keep soft-tissue cells out of a graft site while slower-growing bone cells regenerate underneath. The membrane choice — resorbable collagen vs. non-resorbable PTFE — depends on the defect type, the need for space maintenance, and the surgeon's preference.

The PTFE family

  • Expanded PTFE (e-PTFE, the original Gore-Tex): microporous, often titanium-reinforced for space maintenance; must remain submerged or risk infection.
  • Dense PTFE (d-PTFE, e.g., Cytoplast): non-porous, tolerates intentional exposure to the oral cavity, ideal for socket preservation without primary closure.
  • Resorbable collagen membranes: easier to place; no second surgery for removal; less space-maintenance capacity.

Choosing the right membrane

  • Contained intrabony defect with stable graft: resorbable collagen often sufficient.
  • Socket preservation when primary closure isn't possible: d-PTFE left intentionally exposed for 3–4 weeks, then removed.
  • Large vertical augmentation: titanium-reinforced e-PTFE for space maintenance under primary closure.
  • Patient at high risk of dehiscence: d-PTFE designed for exposure.

What the evidence shows

Cochrane reviews of horizontal and vertical augmentation report that membrane-based techniques are effective; clinical choice depends on defect geometry, patient compliance, and surgical expertise rather than a single 'best' membrane[1].

Frequently asked questions

Scientific references

  1. 1. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. (2009). The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants — a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2(3):167-84. View source